Ask the Governor
Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell speaks with WTOP's Mark Segraves
Paul D. Shinkman,
WASHINGTON - Police drones flying over Virginia would be "great" and "the right thing to do" for the same reasons they are so effective in a battlefield environment, the state's chief executive said Tuesday.
Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, a retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel, says he is open to any technology that makes law enforcement more productive. The use of drones, which was recently endorsed by the police chiefs of Fairfax County and D.C., would make better use of valuable police resources.
Increased safety and reduced manpower are among the reasons the U.S. military and intelligence community use drones on the battlefield, which is why it should be considered in Virginia, he says.
"It's great," he said while speaking on WTOP's "Ask the Governor" program. "If you're keeping police officers safe, making it more productive and saving money...it's absolutely the right thing to do."
A proposal to purchase drones hasn't yet reached his desk, he says, but state law enforcement agencies are looking for the most current ways to fight crime.
That sentiment was echoed last month by David Rohrer, chief of police for Fairfax County, one of the state's most affluent areas.
"Drones will certainly have a purpose and a reason to be in this region in the next, coming years," he told WTOP. "Just as a standpoint as an alternative for spotting traffic and sending information back to our VDOT Smart Traffic centers, and being able to observe backups."
D.C. Police Chief Cathy Lanier, a national security expert, told WTOP in early May that the use of drones is ideal for "a sprawling county" such as Fairfax.
Unmanned aerial aircrafts were first proven in combat environments over Afghanistan and Iraq as a part of the military and CIA presence there. Police forces in Arizona first employed them domestically to help monitor illegal immigration and trade over the U.S.-Mexican border.
McDonnell added Tuesday it will prove important to ensure the state maintains Americans' civil liberties, such as privacy, if it adds drones to its law enforcement arsenal.
The Federal Aviation Administration released a list in April of agencies and organizations currently cleared to use drones, which includes Virginia Tech. Virginia Commonwealth University had been cleared, but its permit has expired.
Drones over U.S. soil has turned some heads in Congress.
"The potential for invasive surveillance of daily activities with drone technology is high," wrote Rep. Edward J. Markey, D-Mass., in an April 19 letter to FAA. "We must ensure that as drones take flight in domestic airspace, they don't take off without privacy protections for those along their flight path."
Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, said in the same letter he "proudly supported" the FAA Modernization and Reform Act that allowed for the domestic use of drones. There are many institutions in his home state that FAA has cleared for drone use, including Texas A&M University, and the police forces in the city of Arlington outside Dallas-Fort Worth and in Montgomery County near Houston.
Learn more about what the governor thinks of tolls on Interstate 95, how long he expects to be governor, and an openly gay prosecutor whose nomination to a Richmond bench was rejected by the Virginia General Assembly, in our live blog:
Here's what he has to say:
10:54 a.m., speaking about prospects as vice president:
I am not being vetted by his campaign.
I have two goals: Elect more governors nationally, because they do a better job than Democratic opponents, and to get Mitt Romney elected.
"I think we need a new president, and that's why I'm supporting Mitt Romney."
"Hope and change" is now "recession and fear." This is a very divisive president.
"I'm absolutely planning to finish my term as governor."
10:53 a.m., speaking about craft breweries selling their own beer:
You see suds, I see jobs. Our wine industry is the fifth largest in America. These small microbusinesses are where the jobs are created anyway.
10:51 a.m., speaking about uranium mining:
If we can do it safely, we should. It will create a lot of jobs. If we can't, we shouldn't.
The General Assembly is going to study if it's safe.
Environmental groups complaining they don't have a seat at the table are "wrong." They don't want us to mine at all.